When I was in school, I was asked to participate in a debate: “Science: A Cure Or A Disease?”. Yes, my school sucked.
Since then, I’ve been observing how the discipline of science remains largely misunderstood or not understood at all.
New Scientist has just published “13 more things that don’t make sense”, a sequel to their highly popular “13 things that don’t make sense” article in 2005. Both the articles give you a brief glimpse of phenomena that science has yet to understand and are an interesting read for knowing more about cutting-edge experiments and yet-to-be-formulated theories.
If you observe the domain of the “13 things”, they deal with
- Issues of time, space, mind and body
- The world beyond human sensory perception either on a micro or macro scale
- Time spans vastly beyond that of human life
Is this surprising in the least? If you contrast how long science has been in existence compared to the universe, life on earth, and the beginning of homo sapiens, to say that nature has an unfair advantage would be a huge understatement.
On the one hand, I am happy that articles like these catch popular attention. They serve to generate interest in science among the general populace. Carl Sagan is best known for his misquoted phrase “billions and billions”, though he never uttered it in the entire Cosmos series. Catchphrases work and are sometimes justified.
On the other hand, I dislike the lame attempt at sensationalization. How many times have you heard or read “unexplained”, “mysteries”, “unanswered” in the context of science? There are no mysteries in science, only in nature.
New Scientist’s 2005 article remains the most forwarded article in the site’s history. The article’s popularity led to a popular book of the same name. If this were a non-profit organization popularizing science, I wouldn’t have written this post. In Jan 2009, it ran a cover with the title “Darwin was wrong”.
The magazine has been criticized by sci-fi writer Greg Evan:
The combination of a sensationalist bent and a lack of basic knowledge by its writers…is rendering it unreliable often enough to constitute a real threat to the public understanding of science.
And did you notice the use of the number 13?
After the intense and enlightening discussion on an earlier post – An Unquiet Mind Over Matter – I couldn’t help resist sharing today’s Quote of the Day from The Quotation’s Page. It’s a perfect rejoinder that serves a sumptuous dessert of humor!
Those who believe in telekinetics, raise my hand
- Kurt Vonnegut
US novelist (1922 – 2007)
When I was young, there was a spate of Indian scientists committing suicide. It had made the cover story of some distinguished magazines. It made me think of how scientists are a relatively ignored lot in our primarily religious and superstitious country. I never could do much for their cause, and hence use my blog to give whatever little publicity I can to deserving Indian scientists.
Energy Conservation
Prof. D. D. Sarma, at the Indian Institute of Science (IISc), is working on developing white-light LEDs to replace incandescent and fluorescent lighting to save energy:
If half of all lighting is based on LEDs by 2025, the world would use 120 gigawatts less electricity, saving $100 billion a year and cutting the carbon-dioxide emissions from power plants by 350 megatons annually.
Single-color LEDs are already in common use, such as traffic lights. White-light LEDs are a challenge, because current methods do not yield desired results for white lighting in building interiors. Sarma’s approach is just at a proof-of-concept stage, and there’s a long way to go, but it looks promising so far.
Diabetes
Livemint reported that scientists at IISc may hold the key to taming the diabetes enzyme. Instead of targeting the PTP 1B enzyme that is responsible for Type 2 diabetes, G. Mugesh and his team focused on the sulfenyl-amides that it produces. Their research was published in the July issue of the Journal of the American Chemical Society.
“Most treatment approaches for diabetes type 2 involve direct targeting of the enzyme in question,” said G. Mugesh, assistant professor, department of inorganic and physical chemistry, IISc, adding that such an approach affects other enzymes, causing side effects.
Research highlights are available here (PDF). Mugesh’s homepage is here. Just yesterday, a team of Australian scientists claimed another breakthrough using a different approach showing how competitive this field is. Worldwide sales for diabetes drugs may bring in as much as $21.7 billion for their makers!
Disclaimer: I’m not knowledgeable about medicine at all and cannot understand the implications or minutiae of such research. I’m not sure if this is just media hype of somebody building castles in the air.
Thought to Action
I’m not sure if Laxminarayan Srinivasan is an Indian, but his name sounds of Indian origin. Anyways, his research is so interesting that I’m including it this post. Science Daily reports that MIT researchers have developed a new algorithm to help create prosthetic devices that convert brain signals into action in patients who have been paralyzed or had limbs amputated. What is unique about their research that distinguishes it from the numerous other approaches so far?
Over the past decade, efforts at prototyping these devices have divided along various boundaries related to brain regions, recording modalities, and applications. The MIT technique provides a common framework that underlies all these various efforts.
Until now, researchers working on brain prosthetics have used different algorithms depending on what method they were using to measure brain activity. The new model is applicable no matter what measurement technique is used, according to Srinivasan. “We don’t need to reinvent a new paradigm for each modality or brain region,” he said.
Summary
An unpredictable blogger like me, understandably never gets suggestions for posts, unlike focused bloggers. So it came as a surprise when Rambodoc sent me the news about the white-light LED research asking if I might want to write about it. So, I’m grateful to Rambodoc for inspiring this post. I like Ek Doctor Ki Maut (Death of a Doctor) as a film, but I hate it if it becomes reality.
(Photos linked to original sources)
Related Posts: Artificial Wildlife Conservation, Indian inventor doctor’s breakthrough


