A to Z of Films Meme (T)

Ever had to take a leak dur­ing a long movie but didn’t want to miss the action? Runpee.com tells you the best time to go and also what you will (not) miss. They will soon have an iPhone app you can use to check Pee­Times, along with a timer that tells you how much longer you need to, um, hold it.

T

Taxi Dri­ver

Mar­tin Scorsese’s Taxi Dri­ver is a hell that we don’t want to see, but some of us live in. Travis Bickle, a Viet­nam vet­eran, taxi dri­ver, is a des­per­ate alien­ated man who tries to make con­tact but fails repeat­edly. After a series of failed attempts to con­nect, he is so lonely that he asks him­self in the mir­ror, “Who you talkin’ to?”

This pow­er­ful lone­li­ness is the epi­cen­ter of the havoc Travis cre­ates, and though his char­ac­ter is one of the strangest of all movie heroes, many peo­ple con­nect with him because they have expe­ri­enced some­thing like that in their lives.Taxi Driver

When a girl rejects him, the cam­era dol­lies away to an empty hall­way. It is as if the girl’s rejec­tion is unbear­able, but later we are shown the hor­ror of vio­lence in excru­ci­at­ing detail. The camera’s avoid­ance of the rejec­tion is the most impor­tant shot accord­ing to Scors­ese. He once said “Cin­ema is a mat­ter of what’s in the frame and what’s out”, but in this case, he keeps an impor­tant thing out of the frame.

Vary­ing speeds of slow motion are used dra­mat­i­cally, either while observ­ing faces in close-up or to increase aware­ness of Travis’s point of view. For exam­ple, the shots of the taxi are at nor­mal speed, but what Travis observes on the street from inside it are in slow motion. Scors­ese takes us inside the mind of Travis with­out using dialog.

See Thurman’s excel­lent analy­sis of how Scors­ese pays homage via allu­sions in Taxi Driver.

Taxi Dri­ver is great because it is not a super­fi­cial, vio­lent, por­trait of a sociopath. It actu­ally takes us inside the mind and char­ac­ter of such alien­ated peo­ple, help­ing us under­stand them bet­ter. If you look at Mar­tin Scors­ese, he looks so gen­tle that it seems he won’t even hurt a fly. He grew up in an Italian-American neigh­bor­hood with vio­lence all around him, and says he just wanted to be a parish priest. Those child­hood days under­lie many of his films, and it is impor­tant to under­stand Taxi Dri­ver in the con­text of his own words:

Now more than ever we need to talk to each other, to lis­ten to each other and under­stand how we see the world, and cin­ema is the best medium for doing this.

Run­ner Up

Titanic

Extrav­a­gant, spec­tac­u­lar, and dra­matic, Titanic is the most-voted for movie that is not in the IMDB Top 250 charts. Clearly, there are those who like it and those who don’t. Here are some rea­sons why I like it:

TitanicI admire Cameron. He took great ridicule and crit­i­cism in his stride for mak­ing the costli­est and most delayed motion pic­ture, while work­ing as a one-man army as pro­ducer, direc­tor, writer, and edi­tor. Heck, he even drew the sketches of the artist hero, Jack! It is a reach of great­ness against all odds.

Atten­tion to detail in an epic of this size is ‘beyond fanat­i­cal’ as the NYT puts it. One of the longest Trivia sec­tion in the IMDB details the extra­or­di­nary extent to which Cameron went to make the movie seem real. Learn­ing about the metic­u­lous level of detail will make you real­ize that you need mul­ti­ple view­ings to appre­ci­ate it.

The char­ac­ter­i­za­tions and sto­ry­line of the romance was delib­er­ately ‘stan­dard fare’, since any attempt at seri­ous char­ac­ter study would have been dwarfed by the vision of the script – to cre­ate a cin­e­matic spec­ta­cle of the tragedy of the Titanic.

Unfor­get­table touch­ing scenes: a mother read­ing to her chil­dren while know­ing they are doomed, an old cou­ple embrac­ing in a watery grave, musi­cians per­form­ing while star­ing at death in the face.

The actual tragedy doesn’t strike us or the char­ac­ters in an instant, like many times in real life. The grav­ity of the sit­u­a­tion slowly descends upon us, slowly. This is han­dled very sen­si­tively, unlike sud­den hys­te­ria so typ­i­cal of dis­as­ter movies.

Awe-inspiring spe­cial effects that are sub­servient to the story and not the other way around.

The movie edu­cates the audi­ence of the ships lay­out and its physics in an enter­tain­ing fash­ion before tragedy strikes. This is ingen­u­ous, because after it strikes, we actu­ally under­stand all the stages of the sink­ing with­out being focused on the physics. Rather, we are so knowl­edge­able about the ship that we are fully immersed in the tragedy, emo­tion­ally involved with the char­ac­ters, and know exactly what is hap­pen­ing and will happen.

Mak­ing a sus­pense­ful, engag­ing movie of this kind is a tech­no­log­i­cal feat. Mak­ing it with­out alter­ing the facts or devi­at­ing from his­tory, and weav­ing a roman­tic drama in it, is vir­tu­ally impos­si­ble. Cameron is a genius who achieves it.

Note­wor­thy Mentions

The Indian Taare Zameen Par was a good main­stream movie that did not con­form to any of Bollywood’s usual for­mu­las. I have yet to find a sub-titled ver­sion of San­tosh Sivan’s The Ter­ror­ist.

Tenue De Soiree was weirdly inter­est­ing. As a kid, I actu­ally enjoyed the 1978 British adap­ta­tion of The Thirty Nine Steps more than Hitchcock’s ver­sion. Two Half-Times in Hell, Zoltán Fábri’s Hun­gar­ian mas­ter­piece that ‘inspired’ Hollywood’s Escape to Vic­tory, is highly rec­om­mended. Ozu’s Tokyo Mono­gatari is high up on a moun­tain that I am still learn­ing to scale – sim­ple, pow­er­ful, and now com­pet­ing with Cit­i­zen Kane as one of the best films ever made. So, here are my note­wor­thy mentions:

  • Throne of Blood: Kurosawa’s adap­ta­tion of Mac­beth with the extremely pow­er­ful act­ing of Mifune is stun­ning. The end of the film where Mifune is killed by a thou­sand arrows is unbe­liev­able, breath­tak­ing, and iconic in cin­e­matic lore.
  • Ter­mi­na­tor II: Pure entertainment.
  • The Third Man: One of the best-ever film noir movies, that I saw only once and want to see again.
  • To Kill A Mock­ing­bird, a beau­ti­ful adap­ta­tion of a classic.
  • The Ter­mi­nal, Spielberg’s enter­tain­ing light film of an immi­grant with a unique prob­lem. Observe the entire con­struc­tion of the set of the Ter­mi­nal and study Janusz Kaminski’s unbe­liev­able, astound­ing cam­era work.

Related posts:

  1. A to Z of Films Meme (S) Winner
  2. A to Z of Films Meme (U)
  3. A to Z of Films Meme (E)
  4. A to Z of Films Meme (J)

28 Comments

  • Mahen­dra, I was quite pos­i­tive that Taxi Dri­ver will cut your list. Cer­tainly Scorsese’s best film for me very very closely fol­lowed by Good­fel­las. It was so anti nar­ra­tive and un-Hollywood like at that time that it had trou­ble find­ing tak­ers, even though Scors­ese already had suc­cess behind him when he made Taxi Dri­ver. I had seen the dvd with Scorsese’s detailed inter­view ..it gives so much more insight into the film and scorsese’s style of film mak­ing. Yes, as you say, it had auto­bi­o­graph­i­cal under­tones. Also, it’s uni­ver­sal theme of lone­li­ness found/finds res­o­nance with audi­ences across the world.
    Titanic was that ulti­mate roman­tic film, so per­fectly cast and exe­cuted.
    Thanks for talk­ing about some other films which I might see now. Strangely, I didnt find Ter­mi­nal good enough even though it’s theme of cross cul­tural mis com­mu­ni­ca­tion is one of my favorite themes. I found Spielberg’s han­dling of the story quite ama­teur­ish and stereo­typed. Per­haps I was too harsh with the film.
    Mock­ing­bird, as you might know, cut my list under K, so noth­ing to add.

  • I have Taxi Dri­ver in my lap­top but have not seen it yet.
    Titanic is a sort of an exam­ple in many ways. To have the con­vic­tion of mak­ing a movie with such a bud­get is an achieve­ment in itself.

  • Taxi Dri­ver — I knew you would men­tion it somewhere.

    Titanic — They made good use of the bud­get, but I didn’t like the movie a whole lot.

    Tare Zameen Par — The best part of the movie was how Amir Khan took the back­seat. Excel­lent movie.

    Ter­mi­na­tor II — I like the movie, but I was sur­prised to see you list it

    The Ter­mi­nal — Didn’t like the movie a whole lot

    To Kill A Mock­ing­bird — Loved the movie and the book. I remem­ber read­ing some­where that in the poll for the best movie hero char­ac­ter Atti­cus Finch was voted at the top (and for vil­lain char­ac­ter it was Dr. Han­ni­bal Lecter).

    Anand

  • Titanic is Bol­ly­wood kitsch shot with ten­fold bud­get (or more?). I endured it. And I swear it would have been dif­fi­cult, if not for enter­tain­ment I got from peo­ple cry­ing and gasp­ing around me.

    Taxi Dri­ver, I couldn’t have put that bet­ter. Pre­cise review, if there was one.

    In T, Tru­man Show had an inter­est­ing con­cept. Although exe­cu­tion left a lot to be desired.

  • As usual a good list and I agree with with asuph about the Titanic although I enjoyed the movie thor­oughly! I enjoy kitsch too! Taxi Dri­ver is one I need to see I guess but I don’t know how Amit will be able to enjoy it on his lap­top! I dream one day of hav­ing a per­sonal home the­atre and catch up on all the movies I have missed. I imag­ine myself doing this at the age of eighty :)

  • Dottie wrote:

    I am not sur­prised to see Taxi Dri­ver. But was sur­prised to see Titanic :) To Kill a Mock­ing Bird — Loved the book bet­ter than the movie. The movie seems a bit more in-your-face than the book. So many nuances in the book! Haven’t seen Tare Zameen Par. It has been on my lsit for ages!

  • Now more than ever we need to talk to each other, to lis­ten to each other and under­stand how we see the world, and cin­ema is the best medium for doing this.“[Scorsese]

    I much pre­fer a con­ver­sa­tion while drink­ing a cup of tea. :D

    Re:Taxi Dri­ver, it wouldn’t have been the excel­lent film it is with­out Bernard Hermann’s jazz score, which he com­pleted hours before his death. And Paul Schrader deserves a men­tion for his excel­lent script which incor­po­rated some auto­bi­o­graph­i­cal ele­ments into Bickle’s character.

  • Mahen­dra:

    If all iPhone own­ers use Run­pee there would be quite a queue at the loos in those times. Exclu­siv­ity does not work if acces­si­ble to the masses.

  • Tora Tora Tora? Not sure how high it would rank here. Per­haps as a note­wor­thy men­tio? I mean con­sid­er­ing you chose Titanic as runner-up ;-) !!!

    Arun

  • Hmm…I don’t have the DVD of Taxi Dri­ver, only the VCD, so I haven’t seen the Scors­ese interview…perhaps you will be kind to do a post on it? :-)

    The Ter­mi­nal — well, I loved the film, and more when I saw it again and again after buy­ing it. Per­haps read­ing NYT’s review or Roger Ebert’s review will pro­vide more glimpses.

  • …‘con­vic­tion of mak­ing a movie with such a budget’…you said it! :)

  • Noth­ing to add really. Haven’t read the book (as always)!

  • You are exactly whom I had in mind when I wrote that some peo­ple do NOT like Titanic! :-)

    Thanks for the Taxi Dri­ver compliment…

    Hmm. Haven’t seen Tru­man Show. Will add it to list. Thanks!

  • Errr. I hate to be pre­dictable. But that’s quite pre­dictable too! Sigh. I’m doomed.

    cheers,
    asuph

  • I too had that ques­tion about Amit and his lap­top! :)

    I share your dream…with a young child it is very dif­fi­cult to enjoy movies at home. I’m wait­ing for when she grows up so I can get back to some good movie watch­ing at home!

  • Mahen­dra! Now it’s time for me to pass on the spoon to you, with water, of course. Only I won’t, because you’ll pass it back to me, as I haven’t seen the movie :)

    cheers,
    asuph

  • I deserve the spoon! :)

    But at least I’m try­ing. After the post and com­ments on ‘An Equal Music’, I did not pick up a non-fiction book, but chose to read a clas­sic that has been in my library for many years, left unread: Farewell to Arms.

    If you have Mock­ing­bird, would love to read it next…

  • I have it, but not sure if it’s loaned to some­one. Let me check today when I get home. Will bring it along when I drop in this week (if I have it that is).

    cheers,
    asuph

  • A piece I wrote in the con­text of Tru­man Show (spoil­ers galore!):
    http://www.buzzle.com/editorials/4–23-2004–53288.asp. It’s an old piece of writ­ing, so I’m not too happy about it, but nei­ther am I too unhappy. It belongs to an era when I used to write non-fiction reg­u­larly :) .

    BTW, you should watch it (Tru­man Show) for another rea­son: beau­ti­ful music. Mostly clas­si­cal piano works.

    regards,
    Amit

  • Hmm…benign deter­min­ism vs. ran­dom and poten­tially risky free-will. Nice read, thanks for shar­ing. Wish you con­tin­ued writ­ing non-fiction as well.

    The ‘scripted life’ aspect of the movie reminded me of ‘The Game’ star­ring Michael Douglas…

  • I knew Titanic would sur­prise many folks. :)

    I know I have to read Mock­ing Bird…

  • Me too, but not many peo­ple can meet face-to-face, espe­cially from dif­fer­ent geo­gra­phies and gen­er­a­tions and time periods…

    Yes, the score and the script…there are sim­ply too many things to like in this movie!

  • Ha ha ha! Didn’t think of that happening!

  • I haven’t seen it, but from what I’ve read and heard, Tora is exactly what a block­buster shouldn’t be!

  • Ya. You are right. It was more like a doc­u­men­tary :) — but still had a charm because it is bi-lingual — but act­ing was not impressive.

    Titanic for me was sappy to the core — and US pub­lic in gen­eral is enam­ored with the Titanic story which also is some rea­son for all the awards (almost a clean sweep IIRC). But I must say, Caprio is a good actor (not here, but other movies e.g. Blood Diamond)

    Arun

  • I won­der if some of Titanic’s crit­ics will have a dif­fer­ent view­point had they seen the movie in a dif­fer­ent light. No advance knowl­edge of the movie. No awards. No crowds sur­round­ing them. No dis­cus­sion of the movie with oth­ers who have ordi­nary movie tastes. And then watch the film crit­i­cally. Just think­ing out loud!

    Yes, De Caprio is a solid actor. He had to work to get out of being stereo­typed after Titanic and he did it well. Catch me if you can, The Avi­a­tor, all fea­ture strong per­for­mances. I haven’t seen Blood Diamond…

  • Yes. That may have helped tam­per my irri­ta­tion (although I did think that the movie had plus points). But sap­pi­ness — I think I can detect when I see it ;-) ! I guess that part wasn’t my cup of tea — besides it is sub­jec­tive. What is roman­tic and won­der­ful to many, can be sap­pi­ness to oth­ers. Not that I detest roman­tic movies — but the one hear I didnt find that charm­ing (maybe because the under­ly­ing theme is some­thing so so com­mon in Indian movies)

    In any case, Titanic was fa…r bet­ter for me than say Amer­i­can Beauty — I just didnt get it AND I know very well about US sub­ur­bian life (even from an Amer­i­can standpoint).

    Arun

  • Absolutely agree. I’ve empha­sized many times in this series that the cin­e­matic expe­ri­ence is a deeply sub­jec­tive one.

    One more thing is that this series (meme) is where you list your own favorite films and write about why you like them. So the posts are strictly not ‘reviews’, but jus­ti­fi­ca­tions for lik­ing the movie. A slight dif­fer­ence, but it mat­ters and reflects in the post.