Rulebook for Indian TV News Producers

Any newbie TV News Producer who wants to compete with the top Indian news channels will be well advised to comply with the following guidelines:

  1. All news is BREAKING NEWS. This also means that if there is no news, BREAK all journalism rules to get BREAKING NEWS.
  2. TV news channels are in the business of TRPs, not news.
  3. It is imperative that Red should be the principal color of your visual style.
  4. Headlines should be in UPPERCASE (known in India as CAPITALS).TV News Channels
  5. There should be more animation on your screen than on an animation channel.
  6. Within each 30 minute segment, there should be at least one story on:
    • Pakistan / Terrorism / Al Qaeda
    • Indian Politics
    • Obama / US – India relationship
    • Cricket
  7. If you’re wondering why Bollywood is not part of the above list, you should realize that Bollywood should have its own 30 minute slot.
  8. Within each 30 minute segment, there should be at least one SMS Poll, inviting reader participation.
  9. There should be repeated ‘COMING UP’ teasers via anchors and headlines on the screen. It does not matter if the content referred to actually comes up or not.
  10. Each news story MUST be accompanied by a video. If no video is available, repeated zoom-in and zoom-out of static photographs is the last recourse.
  11. The date of the video does not matter; having an outdated video is better than no video at all. Forget industry best practices guidelines of showing actual date of videos. Whether the video refers to the actual event of the story does not matter as long as it is somehow related to the story.
  12. The protagonist of the story should be circled red in the video. It does not matter how obviously identifiable he is, or even if he is the only person in the video.
  13. If the video clip is short, loop it till you milk everything possible out of the story.
  14. Politicians, celebrities and sportspersons never argue, disagree, criticize or blame. They always BLAST, SLAM, or ATTACK.
  15. Even if a politician, celebrity, or sportsperson says something of the same sort that he has been saying for the last two decades, he REVEALS ALL, BARES ALL, or EXPOSES.
  16. All interviews to your channel are EXCLUSIVE, irrespective of how many other microphones are visible.
  17. There are no talk shows, there are only DEBATES. Each 24-hour schedule should have at least one or preferably two debates with guests. The decibel level of the debate, not the content, is directly proportional to the TRPs.
  18. For every story shameful to India, question and discuss with the guests, ‘Are we just going to forget this two weeks from now?’. Sound moralistic and ignore the piles and rooms of archives available with you.
  19. Expert opinion counts, but street opinion counts as well, or even better. If you can’t get expert opinion, interview people on the street. The background of the ‘common man’ does not matter, as he is supposed to be common.
  20. Synchronize your ad breaks as far as possible with other news channels, so that people don’t switch and stick to other channels during your ad breaks.

Readers may provide additional guidelines to you via comments below.

Related posts:

  1. The Straight Dope FAQ on Indian Elections 2009
  2. Techno-Social News Tidbits
  3. Indian Democracy & Pakistan’s Dictatorship
  4. Wordle US & Indian Constitution, Congress & CPI(M) Manifesto

57 Comments

  • Very funny stuff. Haven’t been to India in sev­eral years now but this brought back some very vivid memories

  • Oh, you’ve been to India? Funny how some things never change over time eh. Thanks for drop­ping by again!

  • I agree with each and every item. So true. I would add one more though
    “Use stu­pid horror-mystery-music when show­ing a seri­ous story.”

    I remem­ber two years ago when I was back home, they were cov­er­ing the story about miss­ing chil­dren and they kept on play­ing the creepy-wind music.

  • Wow, if pos­si­ble, it sounds even worse than Amer­i­can telelvi­sion. Which is a heck of an accom­plish­ment, albeit in the wrong direction.

    One way to con­sider your post is that it might be an excel­lent expo­si­tion on the advan­tages of books.

  • Mahen­dra,

    Hindi news chan­nels are worse than the Eng­lish ones. The back­ground score, arti­fi­cial voice, silly graphic effects and all.

    More­over, I dis­like the sys­tem­atic elim­i­na­tion of Hindi words from news chan­nels. The chan­nels reek of incom­pre­hen­si­ble Urdu words. So now we have to learn Urdu too?

    Priyank.

  • Amaz­ingly on tar­get:
    Add two more:
    – If any­one attacks you for irre­spon­si­ble report­ing, use the cliche “Don’t shoot the mes­sen­ger“
    – Show noth­ing but Varun Gandhi, Lalu, money being handed out in elec­tion ral­lies, other sen­sa­tional stuff — and claim there are no real issues in this election.

  • Mahen­dra

    Let me con­tribute some:

    1. Do not use just one lan­guage. Make sure your news read­ing is a pre­sen­ta­tion in a khichdi of Eng­lish (or some­thing that resem­bles it) and Hindi/ Hin­dus­tani (never mind the gram­mat­i­cal rules! Throw all cau­tion to the winds and make sure that the verb never appears towards the end of the sen­tence; that priv­i­lege is reserved for the noun in the nom­i­na­tive case).

    (Mahen­dra, as you can see, I have demon­strated with one small exam­ple how to make that khichdi but I can only dream of the pro­fi­ciency that the TV news read­ers have accomplished.)

    2. If it is a female auto­cutie, espe­cially read­ing busi­ness news, do make sure she is wear­ing an ill-fitting, _male_ jacket. Sarees and Indian cloth­ing that fit are to be avoided at all costs. This is because busi­ness news is a west­ern con­cept whose sig­nif­i­cance is diluted if deliv­ered wear­ing pesky Indian clothes, never mind how bizarre like the woman looks in her ill-fitting ‘west­ern’ outfit.

    3. Inter­rupt the ‘news’ every minute to show loud (louder than the news) adver­tise­ments usu­ally of tal­ent con­tests with rude judges and incom­pe­tent com­peti­tors, whose for­mats have all been imported from abroad. It shows the net­work in a ‘global’ light and should scare the n00bs easy-peasy. These ads may some­times be var­ied to show Bol­ly­wood or cricket stars endors­ing prod­ucts in highly sug­ges­tive ways that bear no rela­tion­ship with the prod­uct being sold.

    4. When inter­view­ing a busi­ness per­son, speak halt­ingly — in khichdi Hindi/ Eng­lish — to give an impres­sion that you are so smart you are mak­ing the inter­view ques­tions on the fly. Repeat inane ques­tions till the respon­dent is dri­ven to dis­trac­tion or gives you the answer you want so you can use it as head­lines for the next, we, 6 hours.

    I have more but this abstrac­tion has exhausted me. Waapis aate hain, break ke baad.

  • BTW how come that politi­cian has not yet been booked for ‘inde­cent pub­lic expo­sure’ by now?? Hain bhai?

  • Mahen­dra

    I think a politician’s body is an old tool in the body politic. Some­thing tells me you will find this old post of mine titled ‘Body Politic’ rel­e­vant (and the expla­na­tion plau­si­ble): http://tinyurl.com/cba54p

  • That post is Hilar­i­ous Mahan­dra,
    Some of these blun­ders apply to US news sta­tions as well. The value of jour­nal­ism suf­fers from the con­tin­u­ous money crunch. I now see mostly regur­gi­tated crap from AP and Reuters syn­di­cated across all net­works with said out­dated video loops and all sorts of non-information.

  • You summed it up nicely. I have a cou­ple more.

    1. Brush up on your adjec­tives. Any noun must be accom­pa­nies by a few of the adjec­tives that make it seem like the worst/best/craziest/secularist/shamefulest action that man could ever contemplate.

    2. The times of impas­sioned news read­ers is gone. News read­ers must be sea­soned actors able to accom­pany the news items with ade­quately exag­ger­ated expres­sions so that the dumb (evey­one in India to be assumed hav­ing IQ less than 25) view­ers can bet­ter com­pre­hend what you are say­ing, just in case they missed the adjec­tives we talked about in (1).

  • Nice nice! With this rule­book those tv peo­ple don’t need much IQ to con­tinue their busi­ness. Of late watch­ing the news has become a ter­ri­ble bore. What I find most irri­tat­ing is the rep­e­ti­tion of news, I mean the same thing said in a dif­fer­ent way at least five times in two min­utes! And ofcourse stale visu­als repeated again and again and again! Unbearable.

  • I used to watch these Tv chan­nels in India and I agree with you on all points. I dont think most of these chan­nels are worth of being taken seri­ously any­more.
    Thanks for your com­ment on my blog. Will check your blog more soon.

  • Word. It’s so ter­ri­ble but in India I watch HBO

    num­ber 1 I hate the most, it’s a pain to watch, won­der what they call break­ing news if it happens.

    P.

  • sonyab wrote:

    Hahahaha..this is funny! And so true…stumbled in and think I might keep on stum­bling in!!! :)

  • Uve sud­denly become pro­lific in writing

    This is a great assess­ment on sen­sa­tion­al­ist press in india , and u have a good start­ing blue­print for the new­bee producer

    The most noto­ri­ous are India tv, India news etc
    most of them tele­cast free on dd direct dth
    which is sup­posed to sup­port qual­ity programing

    may i ask — have u seen the crime beat pro­grams that are aired at nite — they can beat any masala film Zee­news has the most amus­ing pre­sen­ter!
    They looks more like a crim­i­nal than criminals.

    or the saas bahu reviews aired at noon ?

    they are all hilar­i­ous (Ps haven’t seen both for a long time since i cut off my tatasky)

  • you left out the adjective/adverb dic­tio­nary :) no news room is com­plete with­out one.
    he was bru­tally beaten… is there a gen­tle way of beat­ing some­one up

    i have stopped watch­ing pvt news chan­nels post 26/11. get my news from dd — realise that other parts of india exist — and it is not so hard on my ears :)

  • Isnt it good to be unpredictable?

    Nyways im not com­plain­ing cause ur one of my fav blog­gers around !

  • was at a SoHO today with a pro­fes­sioanl col­lab­o­ra­tor. India TV was on
    and this was the break­ing news super on:
    gyarah log pak­denge bhagte bhoot ki lan­goti
    on a ghost at one of the teerth dhams !

    i kid you not — that was the news.

  • Looks like Harini caught the Indi­atv bug
    once while chan­nel surf­ing i noticed that they ded­i­cated half an hr for a khatar­nak kida — jo sabko lagta hai — as their head­line shouted
    guess what it turned out to be ? :-)

  • Hahaha! Nice one! I hap­pen to be a new­bie in the blo­gos­phere, but have been doing a fair bit of Media-bitching myself. Pri­mar­ily about the biased reports, and the want to “cre­ate” news rather than “cover” it. All for the TRP rat­ings, as you rightly said.

    And did I tell you that I was con­sid­er­ing Jour­nal­ism for my master’s myself? :P

  • […] are one or two guides already writ­ten on the web, but after my pop­u­lar Rule­book for Indian TV News Pro­duc­ers, I thought I would write my own guide to becom­ing a Spiritual […]

  • Priyank

    You will find they use Hin­dus­tani which has more than a lib­eral dose of Urdu thrown in. Peo­ple in the Hindi belt com­monly speak like that but peo­ple from deep Bihar and UP use tatsam-isms that will fly over your head with equal speed :-) So trust me this is a much pre­ferred ver­sion of Hindi to use on TV.

  • I do not have the courage to watch Hindi news chan­nels! :-) The idea that India is a melting-pot seems to have become a per­fect excuse for the khichadi of every language…

    BTW, how do you rate the graphic, Prof Artist? How many marks do I get out of 10? :-)

  • Whose for­mats…’, of course, refers to con­tests and not com­peti­tors as my poor place­ment of the adjec­ti­val clause may sug­gest. Apologies.

  • ROTFL! :-D

    #4 is a sub­tle, advanced tech­nique that wouldn’t be eas­ily grasped by new­bies. That will be reserved for the ‘Advanced Rule­book’. :-)

  • I absolutely love your obser­va­tions.. This shows a good deal of obser­va­tion. The post couldn’t have come out bet­ter. abt point no 10, they just don’t work hard enough any­time and zoom in and out the same scenes with a spe­cial red cir­cle to denote some XYZ per­son in a very hazy frame…

    Also, Shefaly’s obser­va­tions are quite apt. the ill-fitting jack­ets bit is right on. But the award goes to point num­ber 4, putting words in the mouth of every­one, be it your cor­re­spon­dent or your ‘spe­cial guest’

  • Ah, I for­got music com­pletely! So true. Thanks, Parth! :-)

  • In the US, Fox News comes pretty close I think. Inter­est­ing angle regard­ing switch­ing off the idiot box and read instead — hadn’t looked at it that way. Thanks!

  • Ha ha ha…how true again!

  • Who Obama? Well, he is inspired by the Mahatma, who also went topless!

  • I meant the politi­cian meant in no. 15 in your list. :-)

  • Top­less and topiless too

  • Oh! :-:

    They’ve been splash­ing Obama’s top­less vaca­tion pho­tographs and mag­a­zine cov­ers based on those pho­tographs lately, hence I was…distracted…:-)

  • Both rel­e­vant and con­vinc­ing! :-)

  • Yeah, I observed a notice­able decline in the qual­ity of news on US net­works dur­ing my two long stints — first dur­ing ’01-’02 and next in ’04-’06. Still com­pared with what is dished out on Indian chan­nels, it is still, alas, better.

  • He he he! Yes, an anchor must be a ‘Mas­ter of Adjec­tives’ (no qual­i­fi­ca­tion in jour­nal­ism required), and a Diploma in Fine Arts/Acting will be an added plus! :-)

  • :D If you want me to be hon­est, you get 1 mark for cre­ativ­ity, 1 mark for use of tech­nol­ogy, but 8 marks for appro­pri­ate usage of the picture.

  • Hi She­faly,

    San­skri­tised Hin­dus­tani (which we call Hindi) or door­dar­shan Hindi is much prefer­able to me because it is eas­ier to under­stand. While Marathi has lots of Farsi loan­words, it is still mostly based on San­skrit afterall.

  • Yeah, that’s why I vented my frus­tra­tion via this post!

  • Hey, thanks Dev. I agree…they cause more mis­in­for­ma­tion than infor­ma­tion! :-) Thanks for vis­it­ing, I too need to spend more time check­ing out your blog.

  • Gauri, thank you! Feels good to vent out and share with everyone…:-)

  • Oh, so I get 2/10! Ha ha ha, you are surely a first class politician-diplomat! :-D

  • Priyank

    When­ever we do meet, I shall do my best to speak with you in my best ‘tat­sam’ Hindi. It is accent free and very clear mainly because I spoke Marathi as my first lan­guage as a child. Now all that is gone although I can read and under­stand. I recall, from many years ago, a Malayalam-speaking friend and col­league, who, when he heard me speak in Hindi, used to say: “Aye, baat kar, samaachaar mat parh!” :-)

  • Hey Purn­ima, thanks for drop­ping by. Yup, it’s some­times feels bet­ter to watch movies rather than these news channels!

  • Prax, I’m quite unpre­dictable right? :-)

    Thanks for your com­ments. I have not sum­moned the courage to watch other news chan­nels or crime beat pro­grams! Maybe I need to widen my scope of humor! :-)

  • Yes, I missed the adjec­tive dic­tio­nary but my astute read­ers did add them in the comments!

    Maybe I should check out DD now. :-)

  • Thanks, Prax. I’m honored!

  • Looks like with India TV, who needs any other enter­tain­ment? I must watch it one of these days! :-)

  • Nope, can’t guess…India TV goes well beyond my imag­i­na­tive capa­bil­i­ties! :-)

  • Glad you enjoyed it. Yeah, media-bashing is quite pop­u­lar with blog­gers, I tried to take a dif­fer­ent approach. :-)

    You didn’t leave your blog URL, Adi, else I could’ve checked out your blog as well. Jour­nal­ism for your Masters…hmm, remem­ber my Rule­book and you’ll do well! ;-)

  • I thought I did. I was logged in while com­ment­ing here. No idea why it doesn’t con­nect you to my blog. Any­way, here is my URL: http://ceaselesscriticism.wordpress.com/

    As for Jour­nal­ism, I sure am not enter­ing the field because I would love to fol­low those rules. I will do my bit to make sure that these rules are not fol­lowed. :P Apply­ing to a course in Com­mu­ni­ca­tion as well. Need to see what will click. Any­way, the Media bash­ing is here to stay, I guess. It is too much fun for peo­ple to stop. Besides, the Media asks for it. LOL!

  • i was think­ing some­thing seri­ous on lines of cdc or some vec­tor borne dis­ease etc

    u will laugh — i cer­tainly did expect them to ded­i­cate half an hour to .…
    infidelity

  • Will check out your blog soon. Thanks for drop­ping by again!

  • My good­ness. That is pathetic!

  • Glad to have checked your blog(though I did not read the film reviews as yet as I am not all that into movies). Will keep com­ing back for more once in a while. Do check out my blog when­ever you can. :)

    P.S: I had to sign out and sign back in this time before post­ing. I think my blog link will work now. :)