Classifying a Blog’s Writing Style

How much can Artificial Intelligence learn from your writing? Your gender? Your MBTI personality type? Can someone find out such things about you from your writing?

uClassify is a free text classifier web service, using which you can develop your own text classifiers. Several have been developed already, the most popular being GenderAnalyzer and Typealyzer.

Gender Analyzer

GenderAnalyzer tries to guess the gender of the author. From over 6000+ votes on the site, it appears to have correctly guessed the gender 58% of the time. An Unquiet Mind’s homepage rated almost gender neutral:

GenderAnalyzerforAUM

Since these services do not crawl web pages, they only use the page you specify as their input. So, to get more credible results, use larger sources for input. An easy way to do this with your Wordpress blogs is to specify your favorite tag/category URL. So since a lot of my posts have the ‘India’ tag, giving http://skeptic.skepticgeek.com/tag/india gave a lot more content to analyze, and hence came up with a more accurate assessment.

Typealyzer

Typealyzer takes the text from a URL you specify and classifies it according to MBTI personality types. It can be fun! Here are An Unquiet Mind’s results:

Personality Type

TypealyzerAUM

It is important to remember that this purports to classify the writing style of the author, not the author’s personality type (ignore the marketing byline). Thus, even if my personality type is iNTJ, my writing style is iNTP.

Archetype

ArcheTypeAUM

This is a classification based on Carl Jung’s archetypes.

Love Type

LoveTypeAUM

Sport Type

SportTypeAUM

I guess the above two are for those who want to date or make friends with other bloggers!

Some of the other classifiers at uClassify are interesting too – find out the mood of the writer, the tonality (formal/informal) of the writing, similarity with authors of famous classics, etc.

Related posts:

  1. Some Useful Reading and Writing Tools
  2. Writing for MakeUseOf.com
  3. The Writing Meme
  4. Blog Updates Summary Post

10 Comments

  • thats prob because u don’t talk about soft toys, shop­ping, sob stores, rela­tion­ships, and other mean­ing­less pursuit.

  • Wth is this gen­der ana­lyzer thing! pfft.. You won’t believe some peo­ple have told me to change my web­site color scheme because it looks fem­i­nine. But any­way, do you know how the thing works? Does it have a list of ‘male’ top­ics and ‘female’ top­ics, or per­haps it sim­ply looks for pro­noun ref­er­ences. :)

    Rest of the results were very interesting!

  • I found this very inter­est­ing Mahen­dra. I did the test and the web page guessed that I was a woman but I won­der if they took the url words into account as my url has nita in it! And the other type ana­lyzer came up with dif­fer­ent results when I typed in two dif­fer­ent tags!

  • :) had a lot of fun with this. it said diff things with diff set of options, how­ever with the Arche­type clas­si­fier, it uni­ver­sally said “sta­biliser” for both my OS and WP blog which made me smile.
    my writ­ing style doesn’t reflect my per­son­al­ity aparently…

  • i lll ive it a try soon seems inter­est­ing, let s c

  • :-) Hey Ankur, hi after a long time! Beware, fem­i­nists are often lurk­ing around here…:-)

  • Change web­site color theme?! That’s hilar­i­ous! :-D

    It doesn’t have a list and it doesn’t look for any­thing spe­cific, such as pro­nouns. It has been trained on 4000+ blogs, whose gen­der was known.

  • Hi Nita, thanks! It doesn’t take url words or any other spe­cific words into account — it doesn’t clas­sify ‘nita’ in the text or url as that of a woman, sim­ply because there may be a man who is so over­whelm­ingly in love with a cer­tain ‘nita’ that all his writ­ing and poems fre­quently have ‘nita’ in them — and it should still detect the writ­ing as that of a man.

    Typealyzer is really inter­est­ing to see how we employ dif­fer­ent writ­ing styles when we write about dif­fer­ent top­ics. We may employ a dif­fer­ent psy­cho­log­i­cal pro­file when writ­ing about per­sonal things, a dif­fer­ent one when writ­ing about con­tentious top­ics, and yet another when doing trivia with enter­tain­ment or tags.

  • Inter­est­ing. I think you’re a ‘raw’ writer — there are lesser fil­ters you apply between your thoughts and your writ­ten words, hence your moods are more evi­dent in your writ­ing, and hence the dif­fer­ent results. Stabiliser…interesting! :-)

  • Thanks, radha. Hope you enjoy try­ing it!