You wouldn’t want this Oscar

Satya­jit Ray received his Life­time Achieve­ment Oscar on his deathbed. The only Oscar most of us can prob­a­bly get on ours is this feline fatale:

Oscar the cat seems to have an uncanny knack for pre­dict­ing when nurs­ing home patients are going to die, by curl­ing up next to them dur­ing their final hours. His accu­racy, observed in 25 cases, has led the staff to call fam­ily mem­bers once he has cho­sen some­one. It usu­ally means the patient has less than four hours to live.Oscar the cat

Note that the above is a CNN story. I Can Has CNN, can’t I?

Wait, what about a sci­en­tific expla­na­tion? Well, at present, there’s none:

No one’s cer­tain if Oscar’s behav­ior is sci­en­tif­i­cally sig­nif­i­cant or points to a cause. Teno won­ders if the cat notices tell­tale scents or reads some­thing into the behav­ior of the nurses who raised him.

Nicholas Dod­man, who directs an ani­mal behav­ioral clinic at the Tufts Uni­ver­sity Cum­mings School of Vet­eri­nary Med­i­cine and has read Dosa’s arti­cle, said the only way to know is to care­fully doc­u­ment how Oscar divides his time between the liv­ing and dying.

If Oscar really is a furry grim reaper, it’s also pos­si­ble his behav­ior could be dri­ven by self-centered plea­sures like a heated blan­ket placed on a dying per­son, Dod­man said.

Not sur­pris­ingly, this research was first pub­lished in the New Eng­land Jour­nal of Medicine. For more infor­ma­tion on the var­i­ous research method­olo­gies and sta­tis­ti­cal tech­niques used in the papers of this jour­nal, read an enlight­ened surgeon’s lucid expla­na­tion.

No won­der then that the num­ber of stu­dents enrolling for med­ical schools in the US is increas­ing, while the num­bers for com­puter sci­ence is decreas­ing. Schol­arly stu­dents are attracted by the com­plex chal­lenges involved in study­ing cat behav­ior and such dis­tin­guished journals, rather than wast­ing time in triv­ial things like solv­ing com­puter pro­gram­ming puz­zles.

Tech­no­rati Tags: , , ,

12 Comments

  • Mahen­dra,
    Based on a Level I (ran­domised, double-blind trial) on more than 22,589 patients from 1998 till 2006, I have incon­tro­vert­ible evi­dence that the fol­low­ing are the rea­sons for the Oscar phe­nom­e­non (which is not unique, but has been stud­ied by me with ser­ial CAT scans on 5530 cases):
    1. Cats smell ace­tone in the breath of the dying (cats have strong sense of smell): 57.61% of cases.
    2. Cats get curi­ous when peo­ple stop mov­ing. In these cases, the curios­ity cat kills (26.23% of cases).
    3.Cats fol­low move­ment of staff, and may sense that the more nurses crowd around sick patients, the more the chances of death (13.49% of cases).
    4. Doc­tors and nurses see their own emo­tions reflected in the cat-eyes, since cats emo­tions are very reserved as a rule (mis­cel­la­neous).
    I am puss­ing to pub­lish this arti­cle (have failed nine times so far), but there is some­thing fishy and cata­tonic about the NEJM. I can cat­e­gor­i­cally say this, with­out fur­ther mewsing.

  • Ram­bodoc–

    I can­not tell if you are jok­ing are not. But I am inter­ested in this phe­nom­ena. I have a friend who has seizures, she has a dog that cam smell minute blood com­po­si­tion changes that take place before seizures hap­pen and warn her. It would make sense to me, then, that cat’s could ‘smell’?? phys­i­o­log­i­cal changes that hap­pen before a per­son dies. How­ever, I do not know if ‘uni­ver­sal’ phys­i­o­log­i­cal changes hap­pen a few hours before death. Do they?

    Mahen­drap -

    You are mak­ing me crazy. I like what you have to say, but why do you pref­er­ence such an opres­sive view of sci­ence? Study­ing cat behav­ior can lead to impor­tant impor­tant dis­cov­er­ies, I think. Maybe? I don’t know. But I do know that I Can Has Cheezburger is funny, funny, funny. And I did my under­grad­u­ate stud­ies in both the­o­ret­i­cal physics and phi­los­o­phy, and I am also a com­puter pro­gram­mer — for fun. so I do like sci­ence, and I prob­a­bly think a lot like you. But those cats are funny. Admit it.

  • Aika­ter­ine:

    Ram­bodoc is not jok­ing in the sub­stance of what he’s say­ing. In fact, he’s shed sci­en­tific light on the whole phenomenon!

    Seizure dogs are a very well doc­u­mented and stud­ied phe­nom­ena, there is no mys­tery sur­round­ing them. Just google “seizure dogs” and you’ll see, for e.g. http://www.epilepsyfoundation.org/epilepsyusa/aboutseizuredogs.cfm.

    Finally, I apol­o­gize — there was no such inten­tion! “Oppres­sive view of sci­ence”? What luck — I try my hand at my first satir­i­cal post and I turn up dri­ving peo­ple crazy! I should give it up! :-)

    To clar­ify: I’m the most aggres­sive sup­porter of sci­ence you’ll ever meet. In my post, I was mak­ing fun of how much hoopla is being made in the press, and what is being pub­lished as ‘research’ in a med­ical jour­nal. Rambodoc’s com­ment above con­tains more sub­stan­tial sci­en­tific research than what was pub­lished in the jour­nal. That is what I was (try­ing to) make fun of…

    Regard­ing I Can Has Cheezburger: I’ve noth­ing against cats, and yes they’re funny. I just don’t think that mil­lions of human beings should be obsessed with this par­tic­u­lar hobby when there are so many other, more impor­tant things, to see, feel, lis­ten, expe­ri­ence, think, write, and com­ment about.

    The­o­ret­i­cal physics and philosophy…now that’s inter­est­ing! I was always so frus­trated with Indian edu­ca­tion that I had to choose between ‘sci­ence’, ‘com­merce’, or ‘arts’, and that I couldn’t mix and match my inter­ests. How I envy you…:-)

  • Hey, guys!
    I WAS jok­ing (the num­bers and ‘trial’)! Trust me to hang a Poor Joke in your blog!! :-(
    Of course, well-hidden in the satire were the plau­si­ble expla­na­tions of this behav­ior. Much of the sub­stances which we can’t smell and ani­mals can, are unknown ter­ri­tory. It is dif­fi­cult to talk about uni­ver­sal chem­i­cal give-ways at the time of death. But a few com­pounds, like ace­tone in the breath of an aci­dotic, sick, dying patient, could be com­mon. The rest is, well, smoke and mirrors!

  • That’s what I meant by ‘sub­stance’. Not the num­bers, but your points them­selves shed much more light on the issue than that ‘research’. :-)

  • Oh, I think I was not clear. I can tell that you sup­port sci­ence. And I could see the humor and it was funny. But what I meant with the ‘opres­sive’ view was the tra­di­tional view. I tend to be very open about what I con­sider sci­ence. And like to see non-traditional things printed in med­ical jour­nals. Still sub­ject to the ten­ants of the sci­en­tific method, but a lit­tle on the edge, if you will. I like to see bound­aries pushed.

    And I do agree with you on this statement:

    I just don’t think that mil­lions of human beings should be obsessed with this par­tic­u­lar hobby when there are so many other, more impor­tant things, to see, feel, lis­ten, expe­ri­ence, think, write, and com­ment about.”

    But, isn’t humor, pas­sion and emo­tion just as impor­tant as sci­ence? Aren’t they equal in impor­tance? Don’t we need to laugh just as badly as we need to learn?

    There are things about your cul­ture that I envy:

    (1) the food — fab­u­lous
    (2) the wed­dings — I have been to three and they are amaz­ing.
    (3) indian women have a sense of pride that is absent from Amer­i­can women, luck­ily I am Greek and I get my pride from that side. But young Amer­i­can women, in gen­eral, depress me.
    (4) saris

    I some­times think that men pref­er­ence sci­ence too much. Ratio­nal­ity is impor­tant, but not as impor­tant as pas­sion. That is why I went into my edu­ca­tion, not to impress you, but to high­light that some­one with a love and knowl­edge of sci­ence could also say that emo­tion is just as important.

  • Mahen­dra — I fig­ured that’s what you meant by substance.

  • Ram­bodoc -

    Thank you for answer­ing. It just ‘makes sense’ that they would smell some­thing, some chem­i­cal. I cer­tainly don’t buy into the the­ory that it is a ‘sixth sense’ or psy­chic thing.

  • His­tor­i­cally, sixth sense, para­nor­mal behav­iour and super­nat­ural phe­nom­ena have always referred to things that gen­er­ally didn’t have a ratio­nal expla­na­tion at that point in time. Kind of like when man used to wor­ship the Sun and then pretty much stopped being in awe of the sun when sci­en­tists told us that its a mid­dling yel­low dwarf in a remote cor­ner of a medium sized galaxy.

    But cats, on the other hand, are def­i­nitely para­nor­mal. The one who haunts my house has the abil­ity to break open the milk packet deliv­ered by the milk­man no mat­ter what pro­tec­tion we give it.

  • Now that you men­tion it, Krishashok, my cat does some unex­plain­able things as well, maybe…

  • Aika­ter­ine: I do not sub­scribe to the view that science/rationality are at oppos­ing ends to emotion/passion. I’m extremely pas­sion­ate and emo­tional about sci­ence and ratio­nal­ity. Regard­ing men pre­fer­ring sci­ence too much, how I wish it were true!

    Nev­er­the­less, I get your drift — that men don’t seem to value emo­tion and pas­sion as much as women do. I believe “Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus” does shed some light on this issue.

    Ashok: ha ha ha! Jokes apart, do you really think “man” has stopped being in awe of the sun? These days, who lis­tens to, or reads, what sci­en­tists are say­ing? The swami­jis, devis, gurus, and other enlight­ened spir­i­tual lead­ers hold mil­lions of peo­ple in awe, not the bor­ing scientists!

  • Mahen­dra -

    Regard­ing men pre­fer­ring sci­ence too much, how I wish it were true!”

    You have a good point. And it is good to know that you see the value in passion/emotion, I always got a sense from your writ­ing that you did. But, one never knows.

    By the way, what is the pic­ture on your icon/avatar thing? It is mys­te­ri­ous and beautiful.