Police should catch rioters, not ban Orkut

On the heels of my last post about why India should NOT ban Orkut, comes this confirmation from the Hindustan Times:

Maharashtra police want restrictions on Orkut

An attack by the Shiv Sena on cyber cafés in a suburb on Mumbai’s eastern fringes last week has prompted the state and Central governments to mull a ban on Orkut, a popular social-networking site operated by the Internet company Google.

On Friday, the Indian Computer Emergency Response Team in New Delhi will decide if it should accept a report sent to it by the Thane police recommending restrictions across India on Orkut, designed in January 2004 by Turkish software engineer Orkut Buyukkokten.

The Team was formed in 2003 under the Information Technology Act by the Central Ministry of Information and Technology to regulate online content. It can block websites it deems offensive.

Controller for Certification Dr N Vijayaditya told HT: “We have to study the police report before we come to a conclusion.”

And this:

Thane Deputy Commissioner of Police Anup Kumar Singh said: “While we await a report from the agency, cyber café owners in the region have been asked to request customers to refrain from using the website.”

This is like telling a kid "You can open the refrigerator if you like, but I request you not to eat the candy that's kept in the upper shelf of the door"!

Why doesn't the police take any action against the rioters, who caused destruction of private property, harassed cyber cafe owners, and thus broke the law?

I ultimately have faith in our judiciary who will never let a ban on Orkut prevail in India. But the brazenness of the police is still shocking.

Related posts:

  1. India Should Cherish Democracy, Not Ban Orkut!
  2. Why India Should Not Ban Orkut
  3. Indian Women: Beware of Orkut
  4. Orkut anti-Shiv Sena community flourishes after recent Sena violence

6 Comments

  • Pankaj wrote:

    Orkut is thriv­ing on pro­mo­tion of obscen­ity, defama­tion, anti India sen­ti­ments and other ille­gal activ­i­ties. Many users think it is their birth right to use the space for hurt­ing others.

    The vio­la­tors for­get that by their action they are dis­re­spect­ing the pri­vacy and free­dom of the victims.

    It is there­fore cor­rect to put a reign on Orkut. It is unfo­tu­nate that in India we need to take the long wind­ing route of approach­ing the CERT every time such vio­la­tions take place.

    While “ban­ning” may not the ideal solu­tion, it is a nec­es­sary threat at least as a mea­sure to remove the incen­tives avail­able for Orkut to con­tinue pro­mo­tion of ille­gal activities.

    Pankaj

  • […] india, orkut, phi­los­o­phy, cul­ture, pol­i­tics, google — mahen­drap @ 1:13 am A com­ment on my pre­vi­ous post gen­er­ated so many thoughts in response, that I thought it fit to cre­ate another post. Text in […]

  • […] Even as the police encour­age cyber­café own­ers not to let cus­tomers access Orkut, Mahen­dra Pal­sule writes, “Why doesn’t the police take any action against the riot­ers, who caused […]

  • […] have done our coun­try proud in past here and here. I urge you to take strong action in this seri­ous mat­ter. Our chil­dren can­not and must […]

  • […] media, travel — mahen­drap @ 2:57 pm Unlike the moronic ways I’ve writ­ten about many times ear­lier, this group of peo­ple show us the real […]

  • Hi,
    I am cur­rently using orkut and face­book i always choose orkut as my reg­u­lar usage..
    Because orkut was really nice social site and this arti­cle giv­ing me info about orkut so i really like it..