India Should Cherish Democracy, Not Ban Orkut!

I was appalled by a report in the Afternoon Dispatch & Courier today: "Cyber cafes ban Orkut".

A day after Shiv Sainiks vandalised a cyber-cafe in Kalyan, protesting against certain hate-communities on the website Orkut.com on Sunday, cyber café owners in the city seem to be upset with the police for taking no action against the offenders.

Interestingly, the Mumbai police yesterday issued orders to all the cyber cafes in the city asking them to discourage people from using the Orkut website.

PSI G. Sawant of Kalachowki Police station said, “We have asked the cyber cafes in our locality to ban Orkut and not allow people to surf that site. We have got orders from our superiors to ask cyber cafes in our locality to ban it. Necessary action will be taken against cafes that are found violating the law.”

However, when asked, Sanjay Mohite, Deputy Commissioner of Police (Enforcement), said, “I am not aware of this order. But the local police stations may have asked cyber cafes to stop encouraging Orkut to be used by net surfers.”

A classic case of (mis)governance in India, where the left hand (or local authority) doesn't know what the right hand (or
center) is up to.  But this is alarming - are local police stations free to formulate their own "laws"?

I checked the Orkut Shiv Sena communities, there are about 63 in all with about 6000 users. Out of these 63, only 2 are
anti-Shive Sena communities. Only 1 is of note: "I hate Shiv Sena". The community describes itself as follows:

This Community is for all those people who are sick and tired of Bal Thackeray and his gang called shiv sena.. who for no good reason.. are spreading corruption in the country...They are responsible for creating mass riots, innumerable sources of destruction which have resulted in loss of time, money and innocent lives...

For their own selfish political needs they are exploiting the needy people in the country and in turn making everyone suffer... their fake communism and baseless chauvinism is a hindrance in the progress of the nation of its youth...

So, for all of u people who hate these political monsters, come, join this community and share ur beliefs!!!

The community also attempts to moderate posts on its message board by ostracizing anti-Maharashtra or anti-Shivaji
sentiments. These attempts are not always successful though. What is interesting, is that this community has just over 270
members. So because of these 270 members who may be spread all over the world, a group of Shiv Sainiks attacks a cyber
cafe in Kalyan?

While Orkut as a tool is used for ignominious purposes, it also has its positives. Whatever the case, it in no way violates any
Indian penal or civil law. On the other hand, attempts to ban Orkut are violations of the constitutional right to free speech.

The article further states:

An official of the cyber crime cell, who spoke on condition of anonymity said, “We had recently got Orkut to block allegedly defamatory content about Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar, Chhatrapati Shivaji and Shiv Sena chief Bal Thackeray. The site has been encouraging anti-Indian policies and people are agitated by it. We have asked cyber cafés to refrain from using the site. But soon, it may be completely banned in India.”

Are we going to adopt the Great Firewall of China? Remember, walls are built brick by brick. Today it is Orkut. Tomorrow
it will be YouTube. And so on. We must crush any attempts to (unlawfully) censor the Internet in India, and preserve our
precarious democracy.

Related posts:

  1. Police should catch rioters, not ban Orkut
  2. Why India Should Not Ban Orkut
  3. Orkut anti-Shiv Sena community flourishes after recent Sena violence
  4. Road From Democracy to Fascism

14 Comments

  • […] under: orkut, india, cul­ture, pol­i­tics, google — mahen­drap @ 3:34 pm On the heels of my last post about why India should NOT ban Orkut, comes this con­fir­ma­tion from the Hindustan […]

  • What’s inter­est­ing is that ban­ning orkut will actu­ally end up dis­ap­ponting the 500+ Pro-shivaji com­mu­ni­ties and 60+ pro-shiv-sena com­mu­ni­ties. This baby is not just being thrown, but hurled, with the bathwater

  • Dudecool wrote:

    Some peo­ple think orkut is every­thing only hate the rea­son why it is banned. Not that is banned. By the way I started interne since 1999 from days of my high school and now I learnt more than what they teach you in school.

  • Excel­lent post! I have linked this arti­cle to mine that you will find here. I invite you to my blog and comment.

  • Dudecool wrote:

    Bal Thack­eray is not wor­thy to be glo­ri­fied. he is equal to that Osho Rajneesh, Indian politi­cians and goofy cor­rupt bas­tards irre­spec­tive of their reli­gion. He is as bloody cheap bas­tard who kills peo­ple to gain psy­cho­log­i­cal and polit­i­cal power. Shiv­aji and Thack­eray should not be equated. Shiv­aji is a His­tor­i­cal per­son (Real and alive). We or myself may not know the real­ity if that time when he was there. So Bal Thack­eray is the only per­son I hate. Marathas and we are united by the Indian Tra­di­tion — not as we were born as Indi­ans but we are united by the lan­guages we speak, cus­toms and food we eat. Bal Thack­eray has no moral right to just sup­port Marathas. The whole of south India — Maha­ras­tra and Orissa and Whole of Hindi and San­skrit Speak­ing com­mu­ni­ties are united because of lin­guis­tic unity– Of Devana­gari. We share a com­mon plat­form and thought.Shivaji is respected all over India. I am a Kan­nadiga and I say that what­ever insults hurled at our Moral icons are respon­si­bil­i­ties of the entire com­mu­nity. Per­sons like Bal Thack­eray are only here to divide peo­ple in basis of Lin­guism and Area-wise rul­ing (Sim­i­lar to dons). We were thought about Shiv­aji in our School when we were young. He said to com­pared to Bha­gat Singh and Akbar as said in our his­tory classes. As such this Anti Shiv­aji com­mu­nity should be banned and not orkut, Bal Thack­eray should be given respects with Gar­lands for Chappals.

  • Krishashok: he he he…you’re right, and I won­der if those pro-communities have thought about this!

    B Ramana: thanks. You’ve expressed my thoughts very elo­quently in your post…

    Dude­cool: No com­mu­nity should be banned from Orkut, even if it den­i­grates our his­tor­i­cal icons. I hail from Maha­rash­tra myself, and revere Shiv­aji. But I don’t think ban­ning is right — it vio­lates the fun­da­men­tal right to free­dom of expres­sion, which is vital to any democ­racy. The most pow­er­ful man on earth — the US pres­i­dent — is ridiculed and made fun of every day on US late night TV shows. Books are writ­ten and doc­u­men­taries are made crit­i­ciz­ing and den­i­grat­ing him. These are not banned. That’s what democ­racy is all about.

    Shivaji’s stature is not going to change because a few peo­ple don’t like him. The point is whether those whose sen­ti­ments are hurt by such expres­sions have the right to cause riots and cur­tail oth­ers’ free­dom of speech just because they don’t like it.

  • Good for Nothing wrote:

    Ban­ning a web­site for deroga­tory remarks is not the solu­tion. I am no Maha­rash­trian but I con­sider myself a free Indian. And that I believe is my great­est iden­tity. I also dis­agree with cer­tain ide­olo­gies and cer­tain peo­ple, but by insult­ing them we are not doign any­thing great. Sites such as orkut are help­ing peo­ple con­nect through­out the world. I have met my school friends whom I have last been in touch almost 15 years ago through this site, so would not approve the solu­tion as ban­ning orkut. I would like to look at this in another way. Lets try and play the game, which amer­i­cans play most. Lets SUE orkut for any com­mu­nity they host that are con­sid­ered offen­sive for a coun­try or for a com­mu­nity. The eas­i­est way to dis­rupt a country’s peace is by infus­ing a sense of hatred among its masses. If orkut is infus­ing that hatred then sue them in the inter­est of the coun­try.…. I am sure orkut/google will get bank­rupt if they do not take their ini­tia­tive in clos­ing down such com­mu­ni­ties. So auto­mat­i­cally they will take action against these people.

  • Good for Noth­ing: Orkut is not infus­ing a sense of hatred among Indian masses, the hatred is being expressed by Indian masses using Orkut as a medium of com­mu­ni­ca­tion. Ban­ning one com­mu­ni­ca­tion medium is not going to stop another one from spring­ing up. Regard­ing suing Orkut, which Indian law has it violated?

  • Good for Nothing wrote:

    I agree with what you are say­ing mahen­dra, then in that case we the peo­ple who are using orkut should be more respon­si­ble and iden­tify these com­mu­ni­ties as bogus and report it to orkut so that they may bring them down. You can­not stop it that is for sure but at least try to pre­vent as many as pos­si­ble. The way peo­ple are smash­ing things around is not a way to han­dle such things.… Even they should know that… But the prob­lem is who will face them and tell them the same with­out fear of get­ting beaten up ?

  • GfN: The police. Pre­vent­ing peo­ple from smash­ing things around and break­ing the law is their job, that’s why the police exist. If we sub­or­di­nate free­dom of expres­sion to threats of vio­lence, we’ve lost our democracy.

  • […] had found 270 mem­bers in Orkut’s “I Hate Shiv Sena” com­mu­nity when I wrote about Cher­ish­ing Indian Democ­racy. Today, the same com­mu­nity has 555 mem­bers. In one week, the strength of the com­mu­nity has […]

  • pocglr fuwlaqk zwykd

  • Hi! I was surf­ing and found your blog post… nice! I love your blog. :) Cheers! San­dra. R.

  • Thanks, San­dra.